Sherlokki reminds us what signal can’t always show
Not Sherlokki, but close. The real Sherlokki, a satellite-tracked seagull that disappeared from the map for days during her migration back to Finland. Everyone assumed the worst. Then, without warning, her signal returned. Still flying. Still in motion. Her silence reminded us that absence isn’t always failure, sometimes, it’s just part of the path.
I’ve been following YLE's story on Sherlokki, a satellite-tracked seagull, on her spring return to Finland. Her journey has been full of drama. Along the way, without a shared language or even a concept of one, she’s managed to teach us something anyway.
There was a moment. A long one. Her signal dropped completely. Silence. Everyone assumed the worst.
Then, out of nowhere, the signal returned. Sherlokki was alive. Still flying.
Before that, they had added a new bird to the mix, Seela, just to keep the data flowing. It wasn’t a bad call. We got more insight. More motion. But we had already invested in Sherlokki. Emotionally. Structurally. Observationally.
When the data came back, so did the relief.
It’s tempting to read too much into a story like this. But something about it sticks.
We often talk about consistency leading to value. That value enables decision-making. In this case, consistency disappeared. The map went blank. We thought we had lost the signal, and the bird. But maybe what we really lost was confidence in our frame.
Seela flew on. Sherlokki returned. Both were real. Both moved.
The lesson might be this: sometimes, signal loss isn’t failure. Sometimes, it’s just time passing unseen.
Meanwhile, we try to keep our own systems clear. Efficient. Resilient to disturbance.
Sherlokki flew for four days straight, gliding past pyramids and over deserts, resting only once near Abu Simbel. One eye open. One hemisphere asleep. Still in motion.
Comments